Apologetics: Lesson 2

Apologetics: Lesson 2

In a world that constantly challenges our faith with questions like 'How do you know there's a God?' and 'Hasn't science disproven Christianity?', we need to be equipped with more than just feelings—we need sound reasoning rooted in truth. This teaching takes us on a journey through the foundations of apologetics, exploring how our Christian worldview stands up to scrutiny through three essential tests: it must be universal, internally consistent, and aligned with reality. We discover that faith isn't the opposite of evidence, but rather faith built upon evidence. Through the cosmological argument (everything with a beginning needs a cause), the teleological argument (the fine-tuning of creation points to a Designer), and the moral argument (our shared sense of right and wrong reveals a Lawgiver), we see how logic and reason actually support what Scripture has declared all along. The beauty of this approach is that it meets people where they are—in their questions and doubts—and gently guides them toward truth through thoughtful conversation rather than confrontation. We learn that asking questions is one of our most powerful tools, helping others discover the cracks in their own worldview while building genuine relationships. This isn't about winning arguments; it's about loving people enough to help them see the God who has been revealing Himself through creation, conscience, and ultimately through Christ.

Key Points:

•Every Christian is called to be ready to give an answer for their faith, not just those with advanced degrees

•A valid worldview must be universal, internally consistent, and consistent with reality

•Three fundamental laws of logic: Law of Identity, Law of Non-Contradiction, and Law of Excluded Middle

•"Your truth" is not valid; there is objective truth that exists independently of personal feelings

•Bad logic typically stems from either misunderstanding or incorrect assumptions

•Strategies for apologetic conversations: stay calm, define terms, find common ground, ask questions

•Three main arguments for God's existence: Cosmological (everything with a beginning needs a cause), •Teleological (fine-tuning indicates design), and Moral (universal moral law requires a lawgiver)

•Science cannot disprove religion because science only observes physical phenomena and cannot address spiritual realities

•The Bible has more manuscript evidence than any other ancient document, with copies dating within 35 years of Jesus' life

•Many founding fathers of science were theists or Christians who used science to learn about the Creator

•The question "Who created God?" assumes God is part of creation, when God exists outside time, space, and matter

•Young Earth creationism is supported by Hebrew language analysis and the concept of built-in age

Scripture Reference:

Philippians 1:9-10 (on discernment and discovering what is excellent)

Proverbs 23:17-21 (on directing your heart wisely)

Genesis 1:1 (In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth - discussed extensively regarding the Hebrew word Elohim and the Trinity)

John 1:1 (In the beginning was the Word - connecting to Christ and creation)

Galatians (referenced regarding false gospels and cults)

Colossians 2:8 (referenced regarding false teachings)

Discussion Questions:

How does understanding the three characteristics of a valid worldview (universal, internally consistent, and consistent with reality) help you evaluate your own beliefs and those of others you encounter?

In what ways have you personally experienced the difference between faith as 'wishful thinking' versus faith grounded in evidence, and how would you articulate this distinction to a skeptic?

When faced with the cultural pressure that 'your truth' is valid, how can Christians lovingly but firmly point others toward objective truth without appearing judgmental or closed-minded?

Considering the cosmological, teleological, and moral arguments for God's existence, which resonates most deeply with your own faith journey and why?

How does the concept that God designed humanity to thrive through challenge and struggle rather than ease reshape your understanding of suffering and hardship in your own life?

What strategies from the session (staying calm, defining terms, finding common ground, asking questions) do you find most challenging to implement in real apologetics conversations, and how might you practice them?

How does recognizing that science was originally intended by Christian thinkers to learn about the Creator change your perspective on the relationship between faith and scientific discovery?

In conversations with those who hold different worldviews (Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, atheists), how important is it to understand their definitions of key terms like 'God,' 'truth,' and 'faith' before engaging in meaningful dialogue?

What does the intricate revelation of the Trinity in Genesis 1:1-3 teach us about God's intentional self-disclosure from the very beginning of Scripture?

How can the evidence of manuscript reliability, archaeological findings, and eyewitness testimony strengthen your confidence when sharing the historical trustworthiness of Scripture with others?